For Hindi cinema, a theatrical release has long carried a status that streaming did not. Saif Ali Khan does not accept that hierarchy. In a conversation about the blurring line between OTT and the big screen, he argues that the platform should not change the commitment to the work.
“I hear too many people say that there is a difference,” he says, adding that actors used to the big screen sometimes feel streaming is “a little less.” He does not see it that way: the quality is not lower, and he puts the responsibility in one line: “every frame needs to be respected and worked on with as much passion.”
The Sacred Games moment
Khan speaks from a specific place in streaming history. In 2018, when he starred in Sacred Games, OTT was still finding its feet in India and few actors of his stature had committed to headlining a series. The show became a gamechanger: it demonstrated the potential of long-form streaming and challenged the idea that established film stars had to stay inside the theatrical ecosystem.
That history shapes how he reads the present. He is glad that critics now review streaming content seriously, not as a lower category. The point, he says, is that audiences are still paying for entertainment; makers and actors should treat it as preciously as anything else. For him, being in front of the camera means every moment should be taken extremely seriously.
Where the two worlds differ
The honest difference, in Khan’s telling, is not the work but what surrounds it. A theatrical release carries an “obvious price” and a public scoreboard: opening weekends, commercial expectations, box-office discussion. That, he says, is what makes it scary—it becomes all about money.
Streaming offers a different ecosystem. Appreciation can exist beyond immediate financial performance, and the conversation can be closer to a love of cinema than a chase for numbers.
- Theatrical: box-office numbers and opening-weekend pressure dominate the discussion.
- Streaming: critical appreciation can stand apart from financial performance.
- For actors: the ideal is to do both rather than rank one below the other.
Distribution vs craft
The useful frame here is the difference between distribution and craft. Where a project is released is a business decision; how a project is made is a daily standard. If an actor waits for the release plan to decide how seriously to work, the craft has already been ranked below the platform. Khan’s argument is that this ranking is the mistake.
That distinction matters for Hindi cinema now more than before. Theatrical remains the prestige format and the most public test of a star’s commercial value. Streaming has become central to how films and series are financed, watched and judged. As more leading actors move between both, the relevant question is no longer which medium is real; it is whether the same discipline travels with them.
For audiences, that means seeing platform as context, not verdict. For makers and actors, it means using streaming’s longer shelf life to build work judged on craft rather than opening day.
Source: The Times of India
Comments